Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Past Issues

Comparative study of the carbon footprint of an eco-material ribbed slab and a reinforced concrete ribbed slab

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Comparative study of the carbon footprint of an eco-material ribbed slab and a reinforced concrete ribbed slab

Edem Chabi 1, *, Togbé Armel Amadji 2, Djolomahuton Donald Deguenon 2 and Edmond Codjo Adjovi 3

1 Laboratory of Rural Engineering, School of Rural Engineering, National University of Agriculture, Ketou, Benin.
2 Laboratory of Applied Energy and Mechanics, Polytechnic School of Abomey-Calavi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin.
3 Higher National School of Public Works, National University of Sciences, Technologies, Engineering and Mathematics, Abomey, Benin.

Research Article
 

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 23(03), 1184–1190
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2577
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2577

Received on 16 July 2024; revised on 07 September 2024; accepted on 10 September 2024

Environmental sustainability is a major concern in the construction industry due to its high greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption. To mitigate its environmental impact, alternative solutions that reduce the carbon footprint of buildings while ensuring adequate structural performance are necessary. This study assesses the carbon footprint of an eco-material ribbed slab, consisting of a compression table made of laterite concrete reinforced with rattan, rice husk concrete hollow blocks, and longitudinal laterite concrete ribs reinforced with palmyra wood and transversely with rattan liana. The carbon footprint of this slab was compared to that of a traditional reinforced concrete ribbed slab with sand-cement hollow blocks. The life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted in compliance with the Emission Factor Guide 5 from the French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME), as well as ISO 14040, 14044, and EN 15978 standards. The results show that the reinforced concrete slab emits 1.93 times more CO2 than the eco-material slab, amounting to 3.629 tons of CO2 equivalent for the traditional slab compared to 1.881 tons of CO2 equivalent for the eco-material slab.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Carbon footprint; laterite concrete; Plant-based reinforcement; Bio-based materials; Sustainable building

https://wjarr.co.in/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2024-2577.pdf

Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link

Download Certificate

Edem Chabi, Togbé Armel Amadji, Djolomahuton Donald Deguenon and Edmond Codjo Adjovi. Comparative study of the carbon footprint of an eco-material ribbed slab and a reinforced concrete ribbed slab. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 23(03), 1184–1190. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2577 

Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Footer menu

  • Contact

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution