1 Department of Odontology Forensic, Faculty of Dentistry, Institute of Health Sciences Bhakti Wiyata, Kediri, East Java, Indonesia.
2 Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Institute of Health Sciences Bhakti Wiyata, Kediri, East Java, Indonesia.
3 Department of Dental Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Institute of Health Sciences Bhakti Wiyata, Kediri, East Java, Indonesia.
4 Department of Dentomaxilofacial Radiology, Hangtuah University, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
5 Faculty of Dentistry, Institute of Health Sciences Bhakti Wiyata, Kediri, East Java, Indonesia.
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 18(03), 568–573
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2023.18.3.1122
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.18.3.1122
Received on 01 May 2023; revised on 10 June 2023; accepted on 12 June 2023
Background: Mass disasters often occur in Indonesia, thus require the rapid identification of victims. Teeth can be one of the primary identifiers besides fingerprints and DNA. It includes dentures worn by the victim. The Denture Marking System is a technique for labeling dentures to prevent it being swapped to another. Labeling usually uses embedded barcode, made from laminated paper or gravoply plate.
Purpose: To compare Gravoply plate barcode to lamination barcode embedded in prothese for forensic identification.
Methods: The type of research is a true experimental study with a posttest-only control group design. The sample size used in this study is 20 CDP samples divided into two test groups, one is Gravoply plate barcode and another one is laminated photo paper barcode.
Results: 10 sampels of gravoply plate barcode can be read correctly, meanwhile 6 of laminated photo paper barcode showed incorrect reading and only 4 of total samples had correct result. Chi-Square test obtained p value (p<0,05) means there is significant difference between two embedding techniques.
Conclusion: Embedding barcode in denture protheses for forensic identification is better using Gravoply plate rather than laminated photo paper.
Forensic odontology; Denture Marking System; Complete Dentures; Barcode; Gravoply
Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link
Preview Article PDF
Basma Rosandi Prakosa, Raden Aditya Wisnu Wardhana, Annisa Putri, Emy Khuironi and Wahyu Agung Pramukti. Comparison of Gravoply plate barcode embedding in Complete Denture Prosthesis (CDP) to lamination barcode embedding for forensic identification purposes. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 18(03), 568–573. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.18.3.1122
Copyright © 2023 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0