Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Past Issues

Comparative accuracy of screening instruments for Alzheimer’s disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Comparative accuracy of screening instruments for Alzheimer’s disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Hayford Boamah 1, * and Zakari Shaibu 2

1 Department of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, China.
2 School of medicine, Jiangsu University, China.

Review Article
 

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 20(03), 287–297
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.3.2480
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.3.2480

Received on 25 October 2023; revised on 02 December 2023; accepted on 04 December 2023

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive decline. Early detection and accurate screening of AD are crucial for timely interventions and improved patient outcomes. Various screening instruments have been developed to aid in the identification of individuals at risk of AD. However, the comparative accuracy of these instruments has not been thoroughly assessed.
Aim: This study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy of different screening instruments used for the detection of AD.
Method: A PRISMA selection was used to identify studies across electronic database such as PubMed and Google scholar from up until February 4, 2023.A total of 5 studies evaluating neuropsychological assessment such as, Mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), and clinical dementia rate (CDR) between patients with AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and healthy control (HC). Meta-analysis was performed by Rev-Man 5.4.
Result: The studies included a total number of 1,177 individuals, 398 were in the AD group,409 in MCI and 370 in HC group. The cognitive function assessed by the meta-analysis revealed AD with lesser MMSE (P < 0.00001), MoCA (P < 0.00001), when compared to MCI. But CDR score was decrease with MCI (P < 0.00001). In addition, AD showed a lesser MSSE (P < 0.00001), CDR (P < 0.00001), and MoCA (P < 0.00001), scores when compared to HC.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that individuals with AD exhibit lower scores in MMSE, MoCA, and CDR compared to those with MCI and HC.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD); Mild cognitive impairment (MCI); Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR); Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); Neurological assessment 

https://wjarr.co.in/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2023-2480.pdf

Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link

Download Certificate

Preview Article PDF

Hayford Boamah and Zakari Shaibu. Comparative accuracy of screening instruments for Alzheimer’s disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 20(03), 287–297. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.3.2480

Copyright © 2023 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Footer menu

  • Contact

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution