1 Student of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cuenca, Ecuador.
2 Orthodontic Doctor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cuenca, Ecuador.
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 17(01), 1040–1045
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.1.0111
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.1.0111
Received on 08 December 2022; revised on 19 January 2023; accepted on 22 January 2023
Aim: Observe the measurements of the intercanine and intermolar space of digital models and compare the reliability of different software, Meshmixer, 3D Slicer and Nemocast.
Methods: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to obtain the study sample. Thus, a sample made up of 29 patients obtained from a database with their respective digital models was obtained.
Results: In the results of the measurement in the three programs we obtained that the difference in the upper intercanine space is 1.43 mm, in the lower intercanine space it is 0.26 mm, in the upper intermolar space it is 0.11 mm and the lower intermolar space is 0.25mm.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the results obtained in the three Meshmixer, Nemocast and 3D Slicer programs, thus providing reliable and safe data for diagnostic and planning studies in orthodontics.
Nemocast; Meshmixer; 3D Slicer; Intercanine; Intermolar; Reliability
Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link
Preview Article PDF
Alexis David Armijos Yunga, Nicole Adriana Juela Corte, Fabiana Valentina Pesantez Ocampo and Manuel Estuardo Bravo Calderón. Comparative study of reliability in three software meshmixer, 3d slicer and nemocast of the intercanine and intermolar spaces of digital models. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 17(01), 1040–1045. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.1.0111
Copyright © 2023 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0